Curious as to why the article only focuses on the adverse effects of ketamine. I understand that there are many, which you did a great job of justifying by providing real-life cases and/or studies backed by academia. As somebody in ketamine therapy, I cannot say enough positive things about the drug. If I weren't doing ketamine therapy, I'd either be institutionalized for my mental health or even dead. Can you explain why you chose to focus only on the negatives in the article? Not trying to critique—just genuinely curious!
Curious as to why the article only focuses on the adverse effects of ketamine. I understand that there are many, which you did a great job of justifying by providing real-life cases and/or studies backed by academia. As somebody in ketamine therapy, I cannot say enough positive things about the drug. If I weren't doing ketamine therapy, I'd either be institutionalized for my mental health or even dead. Can you explain why you chose to focus only on the negatives in the article? Not trying to critique—just genuinely curious!